Graphene Applications

Imagine a shirt that monitors your heart rate, a jacket that heats itself on demand, or a sock that stores energy harvested from your footsteps. These aren't distant concepts — they are active areas of materials science research, and carbon-based conductive materials are the key enabling technology behind all of them.
Electronic textiles, or e-textiles, combine the comfort and flexibility of conventional fabrics with the electrical functionality of electronic devices. The challenge has always been finding a conductive material that is simultaneously lightweight, flexible, durable, washable, and processable at scale. Carbon-based materials — graphene, graphene oxide (GO), reduced graphene oxide (rGO), carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and carbon black (CB) — check all of these boxes in ways that metallic conductors simply cannot.
A 2019 comprehensive review by Khair et al. in the Journal of Materials Science maps the full landscape of this technology: the materials, the fabrication methods, and the application areas where carbon-based e-textiles are making the most impact.
Traditional approaches to conductive textiles use silver, copper, or stainless steel — either as woven metallic threads or as metallic particle inks. These work, but they come with serious trade-offs: metallic threads are stiff and heavy; metallic inks crack under repeated flexing; and silver-based systems are expensive and prone to oxidation over time.
Carbon materials offer a radically different value proposition. Graphene — a single atom-thick hexagonal lattice of carbon — has intrinsic electrical conductivity that rivals copper while being nearly transparent, extraordinarily flexible, and mechanically stronger than steel at the nanoscale. CNTs extend this into a cylindrical geometry with aspect ratios that allow them to form conductive percolation networks through fabric at remarkably low concentrations. Carbon black, the least exotic of the group, is a by-product of incomplete hydrocarbon combustion — dirt cheap, highly scalable, and effective enough for practical heating and sensing applications.
Perhaps most importantly, all of these materials can be suspended in liquid inks and pastes, and deposited onto textile surfaces using processes that are compatible with existing manufacturing infrastructure.
The journey from raw carbon material to functional e-textile involves two stages: formulating a processable ink, and choosing the right deposition method.
Conductive inks are typically formulated by dispersing carbon particles in a solvent — water, ethylene glycol, or isopropanol — with surfactants to prevent agglomeration and binders to improve adhesion. The rheological properties of the ink (viscosity, surface tension, particle size) must be tuned precisely to match the deposition method.
Three fabrication techniques dominate the field. Dip coating is the simplest: the textile is immersed in a carbon suspension, withdrawn slowly, and dried. Multiple dips build up resistance-reducing layers. CNT and rGO dip coatings on cotton achieve sheet resistances in the range of 5–100 Ω/sq — sufficient for many sensor and heating applications — without any specialist equipment.
Screen printing forces a thick carbon paste through a mesh stencil onto the fabric surface. It produces dense, uniform conductive layers ideal for heating elements, where low resistance (and therefore high current, high Joule heat) is the goal. Carbon black/polyurethane screen-printed systems on polyester achieve excellent stability through repeated heating cycles and show impressive washability due to the elastic polyurethane matrix.
Inkjet printing jets picolitre droplets of carbon ink from an array of nozzles, enabling high-resolution patterning of circuit traces, electrode geometries, and sensor arrays directly on fabric — without contact, at high speed, with near-zero material waste. It's the most demanding method (ink formulation must be extremely precise to prevent nozzle clogging), but it offers resolution and design flexibility unmatched by other approaches.
The applications being demonstrated in research labs today give a clear picture of where commercial products will emerge in the next decade.
Wearable sensors represent the largest and most immediate opportunity. When a carbon conductive network on fabric is stretched or compressed, the electrical resistance changes in a reproducible way — a property called piezoresistivity. Graphene-coated fabric sensors can detect body motion with sensitivity sufficient to distinguish individual finger movements, monitor respiratory patterns, and capture heartbeat pulses. The same principle enables chemical sensing: functionalised graphene and CNT networks respond to specific gas molecules (ammonia, nitrogen dioxide, humidity) by shifting their resistance, creating wearable environmental monitors for occupational safety or medical applications.
Wearable heating devices exploit Joule heating — the heat generated when current flows through a resistive element. Carbon-based conductive fabrics are natural resistive heaters. A CNT-dip-coated cotton strip reaches 50°C in under four minutes when 40V is applied across it. Screen-printed CB/polyurethane patches on polyester are more efficient still, with the dense conductive film enabling higher current flow and superior heat generation. These devices have obvious applications in therapeutic heat pads, heated outdoor workwear, and cold-weather sports garments.
Energy storage is the most ambitious frontier. Activated carbon — with its extraordinary surface area of up to 3000 m²/g — is an outstanding supercapacitor electrode material. When deposited on flexible textile current collectors, it creates fabric-based supercapacitors that can charge and discharge thousands of times without degradation. Graphene-based textile supercapacitors go further, combining the high surface area of graphene with its exceptional conductivity to achieve both high energy density and high power density in a fully flexible, wearable format.
Despite impressive laboratory demonstrations, carbon-based e-textiles face real barriers to mass commercialisation. Wash durability remains a persistent challenge — repeated laundering can degrade conductive coatings, particularly dip-coated systems that rely on van der Waals adhesion rather than chemical bonding. Standardised testing protocols for wash durability, conductivity stability, and biocompatibility are still being established.
Cost is another variable. Graphene and CNTs remain significantly more expensive than carbon black at scale, which pushes the most technically impressive e-textile systems into premium market segments. However, liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite continues to drive graphene production costs down, and the price trajectory strongly suggests that graphene inks will become commodity materials within this decade.
The manufacturing compatibility challenge is also closer to resolution than it might appear. Screen printing and inkjet printing are already used at industrial scale in the textile and graphics industries. Adapting these processes for carbon conductive inks is primarily an ink formulation and process optimisation problem — not a capital investment problem.
Carbon-based electronic textiles are one of the most compelling convergence points in modern materials science. They sit at the intersection of graphene's extraordinary physical properties, the scalability of established textile manufacturing, and the surging demand for wearable health monitoring and human-machine interface technologies.
The materials are proven. The fabrication methods are established. The applications are real. What remains is the engineering and manufacturing maturation needed to bring washable, durable, affordable e-textile products to market at scale — and that work is well underway.
For an industry defined by graphene's commercial potential, electronic textiles represent one of the clearest near-term paths from laboratory breakthrough to consumer product.
Source: Md. Muminur Khair et al. (2019). Carbon-based electronic textiles: materials, fabrication processes and applications. Journal of Materials Science. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-019-03921-3