Graphene Applications

Electronic textiles — or e-textiles — are quietly transforming how we think about clothing, healthcare monitoring, and wearable technology. At the heart of this revolution are carbon-based conductive materials: graphene, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), carbon black (CB), graphene oxide (GO), and reduced graphene oxide (rGO). These materials combine extraordinary electrical performance with mechanical flexibility, low weight, and — crucially — compatibility with standard fabric manufacturing processes.
This guide walks you through everything you need to know: what carbon materials to use, how to apply them to fabric, and what kinds of devices you can actually build. Based on a comprehensive 2019 review by Khair et al. in the Journal of Materials Science, this is your practical roadmap into the world of carbon-based e-textiles.

Before you coat a single thread, you need to choose the right carbon material. Each has distinct trade-offs between conductivity, processability, cost, and durability.
Graphene is the gold standard: a single atom-thick hexagonal lattice of carbon with unmatched electrical conductivity, mechanical strength, and environmental stability. For textile applications, it's typically produced via liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite — essentially shearing graphite powder apart in a solvent (NMP or aqueous sodium cholate) at high speed. Production rates reach ~5.3 g/h with NMP solvent. However, graphene is expensive and tricky to disperse in inks because it lacks surface functional groups. That's where GO comes in: oxidise graphite and you get graphene oxide, which disperses easily in water and can be reduced back (rGO) after application for improved conductivity.
CNTs are cylindrical carbon structures — either single-walled (SWCNTs) or multi-walled (MWCNTs) — with conductivities that can exceed copper on a per-weight basis. They're produced primarily by chemical vapour deposition (CVD). Their outstanding aspect ratio means they form conductive networks through fabric at very low loading percentages. The downside: CNTs are expensive and their toxicological profile is still being studied, demanding careful handling.
Carbon black is the everyday workhorse of conductive inks. It's produced by incomplete combustion of hydrocarbons — a cheap, abundant, and scalable process. While its conductivity is lower than graphene or CNTs, CB excels at cost-effectiveness and compatibility with standard printing processes. It's the most commercially mature option for heating pads and basic strain sensors.
Activated carbon has an extraordinary surface area (up to 3000 m²/g) created by steam or chemical activation of carbon precursors. Its primary e-textile application is supercapacitor electrodes, where surface area directly translates to energy storage capacity rather than raw conductivity.
Regardless of which carbon material you choose, you'll need to formulate it into a processable ink or paste. The formulation depends heavily on which application method you plan to use in Step 3.
A typical carbon-based conductive ink contains: (1) the active carbon material (graphene, CNT, CB, etc.); (2) a liquid solvent — water or ethylene glycol for screen printing (low vapour pressure), volatile solvents for inkjet; (3) a surfactant to prevent particle agglomeration (sodium cholate, SDS, or PSS are common choices — but note that surfactants reduce conductivity by increasing contact resistance between particles); (4) a binder to improve adhesion to fibres and adjust rheology. Conductive polymer binders (PEDOT:PSS) can also contribute to the electrical performance.
Key rule: match your solvent's vapour pressure to your process. Screen printing needs high-viscosity, low-vapour-pressure formulations that stay wet long enough to transfer through the mesh. Inkjet printing needs low-viscosity, controlled-surface-tension inks that drop cleanly from the nozzle without clogging.

Dip coating is the simplest entry point. You immerse the textile in a suspension of your carbon material, withdraw it at a controlled speed, and let it dry. Repeat for additional layers. No specialist equipment required — a beaker and a steady hand can get you started.
Best for: CNT and graphene/rGO coatings on cotton, polyester, or nylon. CNT dip-coated fabrics achieve sheet resistances as low as 5–100 Ω/sq depending on concentration and number of dips. The trade-off: dip coating gives less precise patterning and the binder-free approach (relying on van der Waals adhesion of CNTs and graphene to fibres) can result in poor wash durability.

Screen printing pushes carbon paste through a mesh stencil onto the fabric surface. It's the preferred industrial method for thick, dense conductive layers — critical for heating pads where you need low resistance (high current, high Joule heat). A squeegee forces the paste through the open mesh areas, depositing a precise pattern. Multiple layers can be printed to reduce resistance further.
Screen-printed CB/polyurethane paste on polyester fabric produces PU/CB/fabric systems with excellent stability, repeatability, and stretchability. The polyurethane matrix provides mechanical elasticity while CB delivers the conductivity. These systems survive repeated heating cycles up to 60 minutes and are prime candidates for low-cost wearable heaters.
Best for: heating elements, large-area electrodes, and designs requiring thick conductive deposits. Sheet resistances in the 10–100 Ω/sq range are typical.

Inkjet printing jets picolitre droplets of carbon ink through a nozzle array at specific positions, allowing high-resolution patterning without physical contact. It's the most precise and most demanding method: ink viscosity must be within a narrow window (typically 1–30 mPa·s), surface tension must be controlled (28–33 mN/m range), and particle size must be well below nozzle diameter to prevent clogging.
For textiles specifically, water-based graphene or rGO inks work well because the slower evaporation allows the ink to penetrate into fibre interstices, creating mechanically robust conductive networks. Inkjet printing is ideal for creating fine sensor electrodes, fine circuit traces, and RFID antenna patterns directly on fabric.
Best for: sensor electrodes, circuit interconnects, RFID antennas, and research prototyping. Resolution can reach sub-100 μm feature sizes under optimised conditions.

When a conductive carbon network is deformed, the contact resistance between carbon particles changes — producing a measurable electrical signal proportional to strain or pressure. Graphene-coated fabrics are particularly sensitive: even small stretches of 1–5% produce reproducible resistance changes that can be detected by a simple microcontroller with an ADC. Applications include motion capture garments for physiotherapy and sports performance, gesture recognition gloves, and respiratory monitoring vests.
Functionalised carbon materials change their electrical properties in response to chemical environments. GO and rGO, with their oxygen-containing surface groups, are highly sensitive to humidity, NH₃, NO₂, and VOCs. By incorporating functionalised CNTs or metal nanoparticle-decorated graphene into a textile electrode, you can create a fabric that monitors gas-phase chemicals in real time — useful for occupational safety, environmental monitoring, or wound care.
Joule heating — resistive heating caused by current flow through the conductive textile — enables washable, flexible heating pads. The heating power is P = I²R, so reducing fabric resistance increases heating efficiency. Screen-printed CB/PU systems on polyester fabrics can reach 50°C within 200 seconds at 40V applied voltage. The PU matrix provides the mechanical flexibility and washability. These devices find applications in therapeutic heat patches, outdoor heated clothing, and de-icing textiles for aerospace.
Carbon materials' high surface area makes them natural supercapacitor electrode candidates. Activated carbon coated on textile current collectors achieves specific capacitances of 100–300 F/g. Graphene-based textile supercapacitors combine high power density (thanks to fast ion kinetics at the graphene surface) with flexibility and light weight. These are being integrated into garments that harvest and store energy from body movement or solar cells woven into the fabric.
✅ Choose your carbon material (graphene/rGO for sensors, CB for heaters, AC for supercapacitors)
✅ Select your solvent system (water + surfactant for dip coating and screen printing; volatile solvents for inkjet)
✅ Pick your fabrication method (dip coat for simplicity, screen print for thick layers, inkjet for precision)
✅ Characterise conductivity after each processing step with a 4-probe resistance measurement
✅ Test wash durability: 10 wash cycles at 40°C is the minimum acceptable benchmark for wearable applications
✅ Validate your device function under repeated deformation (1000+ stretch/compress cycles minimum)
Carbon-based electronic textiles sit at an exciting crossroads of materials science, textile engineering, and electronics. The combination of graphene's extraordinary conductivity, CNTs' mechanical resilience, and carbon black's low cost and processability gives engineers a rich toolkit for building the next generation of wearable devices — from health monitors that feel like ordinary shirts to heated jackets that respond intelligently to temperature drops.
The key insight from Khair et al.'s review is that no single carbon material or fabrication method wins across all applications. The right choice depends on your target property: conductivity, flexibility, cost, accuracy, or energy storage. Start simple with dip coating and carbon black, characterise your results carefully, and scale up from there.
Source: Md. Muminur Khair et al. (2019). Carbon-based electronic textiles: materials, fabrication processes and applications. Journal of Materials Science. DOI: 10.1007/s10853-019-03921-3